Growing Up Wired: Myths in Educating Your Kids in the Digital Age

One of the main objectives of education is to quash misinformation. That entails recognizing and refuting the many misconceptions flowing online, word-of-mouth, and mere speculations. At some point, we’re all guilty of being misled by contemporary myths, with education and technology as a familiar premise.

Schools have been ramping up the technology used in education for decades, from basic computer laboratories to teach fundamental computer skills to modest virtual learning meant to assist students amidst the pandemic.

Some experts, parents, educators, and lawmakers have raised eyebrows and voiced disagreement against this trend, warning that increased classroom technology might wind up doing more damage than good. This leads to the rest of the population wondering if actual data substantiate any of these grounds and concerns.

The cost of technology is high.

One of the running arguments against the issue is the premise that technology costs an arm and a leg and might not even deliver advantages infraction to that expense. The typical American school system spends approximately $12,000 per student, whereas the fee of a mere laptop or tablet might gobble up to $400.

However, many projects and organizations are devoted to incorporating more technology inexpensively and efficiently into classrooms. Parents in several districts would even be eager to supply their kids with these tools for a better learning opportunity. Moreover, alternatives are always to the rescue in case of emergencies or special needs.

For example, it is more inexpensive to restore your equipment’s pristine condition by having your cellphone or device repaired than to acquire a new one. Besides, not every kid needs a top-of-the-line gadget to obtain a better education. While technology is costly, it is not unaffordable.

It decreases social interaction.

Some claim that pupils who often use modern technologies in school will be less sociable than those who can interact primarily with other kids. The assumption here is that these gadgets have become a substitute for traditional communication that involves human interaction. Thus, it will have a detrimental influence on growing children’s social skills.

That’s inaccurate at some point. Many have missed the fact that technology will have a beneficial or detrimental influence on a person’s social development, based on how it is used. According to research, some tools may even help individuals enhance their communication skills. It’s imperative to emphasize that these gadgets are primarily utilized to improve and introduce additional vehicles for learning and not eliminate social connections.

It suffocates cognitive development.

It’s undeniable that our overdependence on technology might promote the decline of some cognitive capabilities. For instance, if you educate children to use calculators primarily, they may not develop the skills to solve simple arithmetic problems mentally. Frequently relying on GPS can also make relevant cognitive abilities that help you think logically rapidly deteriorate with time.

The issue with this theory is that, because technological advancement has become so pervasive in our daily lives, children may not depend on these abilities solely as they grow older. We may even be preventing them from learning vital skills that they can use further on in life. Furthermore, schools do not rely entirely on technology — it is a hybrid approach that teaches technical and non-technical competencies.

It will only cause distractions.

Some people believe that the use of technology in school is a more significant distraction than anything else. They fear that children might only utilize their devices to pass the time and surf the internet, irrelevant to the educational process.

That’s entirely true. However, we need to understand that it’s not an inherent technological issue— it’s an ingrained child problem. Anyone who has ever been in a classroom understands that everything, whether it’s passing down notes to your seatmate or texting your friends, is a potential temptation. Technology does not add to the distractions generally present in the classrooms.

Lowers academic scores

Some individual case studies of institutions using technology merely found any improvement in their student’s academic performance and standardized test scores.

What’s crucial to understand is that conventional test results do not accurately represent what kids gain from their schooling. There are reasons for and against using standardized exams to determine the effectiveness of educational programs, but let’s face it. The exams we currently use have not kept pace with the modern-day. They do not gauge technical skills, nor can they effectively assess a child’s capability in diverse, prospective professional pathways.

No one suggests that institutions switch to an entirely innovative curriculum, whether integrating AI platforms or exclusively utilizing gadgets for study materials. However, advocating against using technology will only hinder children from gaining the skill sets they’ll need to function in our ever-evolving world. The sooner and more fully we incorporate technology in education, the brighter and better-prepared our students can become.